Below you will find our fuel use comparison examples and data using all four propulsion types we considered. The passage examples use some different lengths and situations.
For these examples we wanted to use a mix of motoring and sailing. It is accepted by most cat sailors that a typical production 'comfort' cats has a 50% motoring vs sailing ratio, though this is on the shorter passages. However, we are planning to build a performance cat which means we can sail in lighter winds. Therefore, our ratio will be figured at 40% motoring and 60% sailing for most passages. For a Trade Wind passage while we cross an ocean, things may be different. We figure we will only motor a maximum two 3 hours stints a day, but may become becalmed at times as well. There are some examples of these in our calculations.
About regeneration while sailing: additional power would come from regen and will make the Hybrid, Parallel, or Combo systems even more fuel efficient. The first eight examples will be without regeneration, but I will go over eight more passage examples using regeneration.
The Hybrid will be far more efficient at regeneration if using the SD15 servoprops. We will figure them at 2 kw per prop sailing at 9 knots. The shaft drives with auto adjusting ECO*Star props on the 20 kw motors of the Combo system will be only half as efficient at 1 kw per prop at 9 knots. Finally, the 10 kw motors of the Parallel system will be closer to 500 watts per motor at that boat speed.
Note: these trips figure in the need to make power for House uses of at about 10kw per 24 hour period.
How we calculated: Based on other boat data, a single diesel engine on a 50' catamaran will use about 1 gallon per hour (GPH) at a boat speed of 5 knots. For the Hybrid, a 20 kw generator uses 1.6 GPH (when needed). For maximum efficiency, an electric motor should be run at 75% of max rating. Therefore, we will figure 15kw, minus the conversion rate of 20% means we actually get 12 kw when motoring for long stints. 5 kw is needed to keep cruising speed of 5 knots. Our parallel diesel engines (2 x 50 hp) will burn around .75 gallons, each, per hour to maintain cruising speed (5 knots). While acting as a generator, the 50 hp engine turning the 10 kw electric motor will add extra drag and increase fuel burn to 1.25 gph. Sometimes, we must run both diesels to get the additional generated power, but does send 7 kw to the battery while running at cruising speed. The Combo boat's diesel will burn more like 1.5 gallons per hour when generating power since it has to turn a 25 kw motor, which causes even more drag.
Finally, the hybrid boat would have a slightly larger permanent battery bank at 33 kw. The Parallel and Combo systems will have 22 kw of main battery and shorter passages, but add the tender/auxiliary battery for longer passages, increasing to 33 kw. That equates to 1.3 hours on 22kw or 2 hours motoring on 33kw, both at 5 knots.
One last note: Any savings of less than 1 gallon is within my margin of error, so we should just throw out that difference and figure that when the numbers come out that close, those boats are tied for that passage.
1) Short Passage: 4 hours and 30 min.
36 nautical miles trip
(1:48 motoring, 2:42 sailing )
2) 1 Day Passage, Daytime: 7 hours and 30 min.
60 nautical mile trip:
(3 hours motoring and 4.5 hours sailing)
3) Single Passage Nighttime, 4.5 hours 60 nautical mile trip
(3 hours motoring and 4.5 hours sailing)
4) Single Day Passage, Daytime, 11.25 hours 90 nautical mile trip
(4.5 hours motoring and 6.75 hours sailing)
5) Day Passage with, 32.5 hour voyage 260 nautical mile trip
(13 hours motoring, 19.5 hours sailing)
6) Mid-Length Passage
1,000 mile trip: 4.5 days
(43 hours motoring, 65 hours sailing)
7) Day Atlantic Crossing, 15.5 days 3,000 miles: 15.5 days
(6 hours motoring, 18 hours sailing, per day)
8) Ocean Passage becalmed 3 days (3,000 mile trip: 15.5 days).
9) Same as above, but becalmed for 7 days (3,000 mile trip: 15.5 days).
Passage Length | Miles | Combo | Parallel | Hybrid | Diesel |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Passage One | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 |
Passage Two | 60 (day) | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0 | 3 |
Passage Three | 60 (night) | 1.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3 |
Passage Four | 90 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 5.6 |
Passage Five | 260 | 6.75 | 12.5 | 12.8 | 13 |
Passage Six | 1,000 | 27.75 | 46.25 | 67.2 | 43 |
Passage Seven | 3000 | 56.63 | 94.4 | 94.4 | 93 |
Passage Eight | 3000 (becalmed 3 days) | 103.1 | 142.45 | 110.4 | 147 |
Passage Nine | 3000 (becalmed 7 days) | 92 | 100 | 190.29 | 219 |
Now let's compare some passages using regeneration. We are figuring 9 knots of boat speed for this performance catamaran. At that speed, the Hybrid, using Oceanvolt SD15 servoprops, will have the highest amount of regeneration at 2 kw per motor. The Parallel is the least, since it has 10 kw motors without servoprops, so it only gets 500 watts per motor. The Combo is in the middle, with 20 kw motors, getting 1 kw per motor. Let's see how they all do!
1) Short Passage: 4 hours and 30 min.
36 nautical miles trip
(1:48 motoring, 2:42 sailing )
2) 1 Day Passage, Daytime: 7.5 hours
60 nautical mile trip:
(3 hours motoring and 4.5 hours sailing)
3) Single Day Passage Nighttime, 7.5 hours 60 nautical mile trip
(3 hours motoring and 4.5 hours sailing)
4) Single Day Passage, Daytime, 11.25 hours 90 nautical mile trip
(4.5 hours motoring and 6.75 hours sailing)
5) Day Passage with, 32.5 hour voyage 260 nautical mile trip
(13 hours motoring, 19.5 sailing)
6) Mid-Length Passage
1,000 mile trip: 4.5 days
(43 hours motoring, 65 hours sailing)
7) Ocean Crossing, overcast, with steady wind, with regen
(3,000 mile trip: 15.5 days).
8) Ocean Crossing, 3 days becalmed
(3,000 mile trip: 15.5 days).
9) Ocean Crossing, no wind at night with regen
(3,000 mile trip - 15.5 days).
Passage Length | Miles | Combo | Parallel | Hybrid | Diesel |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Passage One | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 |
Passage Two | 60 (day) | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0 | 3 |
Passage Three | 60 (night) | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 3 |
Passage Four | 90 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 5.6 |
Passage Five | 260 | 5.25 | 15 | 9.6 | 13 |
Passage Six | 1,000 (overcast) | 26.25 | 50 | 60.8 | 43 |
Passage Seven | 3000 (overcast) | 21.75 | 36.25 | 46.4 | 46.5 |
Passage Eight | 3000 (3 days becalmed) | 60 | 99 | 127.2 | 84.5 |
Passage Nine | 3000 (no wind at night) | 70.88 | 84.38 | 185.6 | 124 |
Short Daylight | Overnight | Two Day | Mid Length | Major Crossings |
---|---|---|---|---|
1436 | 494 | 79 | 36 | 29 |
Propulsion Type | Short Daylight | Over- night | Two Day | Mid Length | Major Crossing | Total gallons burned | Cost at $5/gallon | Hours Diesel ran |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diesel (2 55 hp engines) | 2584.80 | 1482 | 1027 | 1548 | 2450.5 | 9092.3 | $45,461.50 | 9092.30 |
Hybrid (2 20 kw electric motors plus 2 diesel generators) | 0 | 790.4 | 379.2 | 2,188.8 | 3,688.8 | 7426.40 | $37,132.00 | 4,641.50 |
Parallel (2 45 hp diesels with 10 kw elec. motors) | 0 | 741 | 711 | 1,080 | 1,729.27 | 4,261.27 | $21,306.35 | 3,629.216 |
Combo (A 80hp Diesel w/ 25 kw elec. motor + a 20 kw elec. motor) | 0 | 494 | 276.5 | 630 | 1152.75 | 2,553.25 | $12,766.25 | 1,977.68 |
One thing to note, we are maintaining 5 knots of speed throughout these calculations. Were we to slow down to 3 or 4 knots, the Hybrid would suddenly do far better since it would not need the generators anywhere near as much. However, for our comparison, we wanted to keep up a typical cruising boat speed.
In all the examples, with or without regen, the Combo boat wins in every case except the first two short passages, where it ties the other Hybrid options, but does better than the diesel. Therefore, when it comes to fuel savings, the Combo boats win, hands down, nearly always coming out on top or equal to the other three boats.
Free AI Website Creator